Jump to content
elfgradost/Getty Images
Equal rights and Social Participation
Art. 1, 2, 3, 20

German passport must not depend on income: GFF files lawsuit for equal citizenship rights

Anyone who lives in Germany permanently must have a realistic path to citizenship. A change in the law has blocked this for many people with disabilities and elderly people. We are taking legal action.

We are supporting a lawsuit at the Cottbus Administrative Court to fight for equal access to German citizenship for all people living permanently in Germany. The relevant authority in Brandenburg had refused to grant German citizenship to an elderly couple because they receive benefits. Since 2024, foreigners have only been entitled to naturalization if they can support themselves. Under the new rules, there are no longer any exceptions for elderly people and people with disabilities.

Soraia Da Costa Batista

Lawyer and case coordinator at the GFF

“German citizenship is not a bonus reward for earned income. Authorities must not block elderly people with disabilities from participating in democracy simply because they receive financial support. The government cannot demand something from them that they are incapable of doing.”

After arriving in Germany in 2015, the man and woman from Palestine completed integration courses, learned German, worked, and were active in the community. Due to their age and illnesses, they now require support. In our view, the fact that the authorities exclude elderly people with disabilities from the right to naturalization violates general personal rights in conjunction with the principle of democracy, the prohibition of discrimination, and the general principle of equality.

The man and woman from Palestine are considered stateless in Germany, are of retirement age, and will be reliant on welfare benefits for the foreseeable future. Both have health problems and have applied for disability status. This makes them particularly vulnerable individuals. They, too, must have the opportunity to participate in German democracy and be democratically represented. The plaintiffs are represented in court by attorney Dr. Adrian Klein.

Since 2024, the Nationality Act (StAG) no longer grants the right to naturalization if people receive benefits to secure their livelihood. Previously, there was an exception for foreigners who were dependent on such benefits through no fault of their own. This included single parents, students, pensioners, and people with disabilities — as in the case of the married couple. Such an exemption is still necessary today in order to avoid systematically discriminating against groups of people who, through no fault of their own, are unable to earn a living or cannot do so entirely on their own. Citizenship law is currently undergoing reform. The relevant committees of the Bundesrat have already recommended reintroducing the exemption.

In Germany, naturalization is essentially possible in two ways: Foreigners who meet all the requirements for naturalization have a right under Section 10 of the German Nationality Act (StAG) that the authorities must comply with. Since the reform of 2024, many cases fall under the category of so-called discretionary naturalization (Section 8 StAG), which, due to its relevance to fundamental rights, must also result in a right in certain cases. The statelessness of the couple from Palestine must also be taken into account. A court ruling on whether and when a claim also exists under Section 8 StAG is long overdue. Anyone who lives permanently in Germany must be allowed to vote in elections and be represented through access to public office. This applies in particular to vulnerable groups who need a strong voice.

In addition to people who receive basic income support in old age or in the event of reduced earning capacity, this also directly affects anyone who cares for partners or relatives. Anyone who takes on care responsibilities without being married or in a civil partnership and therefore receives support is no longer eligible for naturalization under the reformed law. The exclusion of vulnerable groups was also criticized by many associations and experts during the legislative process.

Freedom needs fighters!

Defending fundamental rights in court

Grundrechte verteidigen.